Evaluation Methodology
A transparent evaluation system that ensures every score stands up to scrutiny.
Based on public data and scientific methods, free from commercial interests.
The evaluation methodology and weighting system are publicly disclosed for social oversight.
Complete data lineage and audit trail with full traceability and verification support.
Evaluation results are fully isolated from business partnerships to ensure impartiality.
Data Source
Evaluation data is drawn from five dimensions, each with defined collection frequencies and weightings to ensure comprehensive and reliable results.
Public Data Collection
40%Corporate websites, product documentation, financial reports, patent databases, academic paper platforms, and other public channels
Industry survey data
25%Industry reports and market research data obtained through collaboration with third-party research institutions
Expert Assessment Data
20%Invite AI experts to professionally evaluate and score specific dimensions.
Enterprise Declaration Data
10%Qualification proofs, business data, and other submission materials proactively provided by the enterprise
User Feedback Data
5%Platform user reviews, feedback on enterprises and products, and usage experience data
Scoring Model
Comprehensive Score Calculation Formula
Quantitative Metrics
Score calculated based on Min-Max normalized raw data (0-100 points)
Qualitative indicators
Combined rating based on expert evaluation and user feedback (0-100 points)
Weight Determination Method
AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)
Build the judgment matrix to determine the initial weights for each dimension.
Delphi method calibration
Invite industry experts to conduct multi-round anonymous evaluations for weight calibration.
Dynamic adjustment
Dynamically adjust weight allocations annually based on industry development stages.
Enterprise Evaluation Dimension Weights
Product Evaluation Dimension Weights
Dimension Weights for Influencer Impact Assessment
Evaluation Period
Quarterly Review
End of each quarterComposite Index Rankings, covering key evaluation subjects such as enterprises, products, and projects.
Annual Review
Every 12th monthAnnual Leaderboard: Weighted summary of full-year data
Topic Evaluation
IrregularSpecialized review reports for specific tracks or trending events
Real-time updates
ContinueIndex scores dynamically adjust based on the latest data.
Audit Mechanism
To ensure the accuracy and credibility of review results, we have implemented a rigorous five-stage manual review process. The entire workflow typically takes 8-13 days.
Data Cleaning
1-2 daysData Engineering TeamAutomated data quality checks to filter out outliers and invalid data.
Initial Review Analysis
2-3 daysAnalysis TeamData analysts manually review collected data to ensure accuracy.
Expert Review
3-5 daysExpert Committee3-5 industry experts independently evaluate qualitative indicators, with a weighted average score calculated.
Cross-validation
1-2 daysQuality Assurance TeamCross-validate key data from multiple sources to ensure consistency.
Final Publish
1 daysEvaluation CommitteePublish only after the review committee approves and confirms the final results.
Business Partnership Statement
Jingzhi AI Evaluation Center hereby declares:
- ReviewEvaluation Independence：All review results are derived from objective data and scientific methods, unaffected by any commercial partnerships.
- PayPaid promotions do not affect ratings.：Purchasing platform services (e.g., promotions, memberships) does not affect your rating score.
- profitConflict of Interest：Team members shall not participate in evaluations of companies with which they have a conflict of interest.
- NumberData Transparency：The evaluation methodology and weighting system are publicly disclosed for social oversight.
- TheThird-party audit：Periodically invite independent third-party agencies to audit the evaluation process.
Appeal and Correction Process
If you disagree with the evaluation result, you may submit an appeal through the following process. We commit to completing the review and providing feedback within 20 business days.
Submit Appeal
Submit an appeal form via the platform's "Data Correction" entry. Required information includes company name, reviewed entity, objection dimension, and supporting documentation.
Acceptance Confirmation
The Evaluation Center will confirm receipt within 5 business days, send a confirmation notice, and provide the estimated processing time.
Verify and Process
The data team reviews the appeal and contacts the appellant for additional materials if necessary.
Result Feedback
If correction is required, update the review data and specify the changes; otherwise, provide a detailed rationale and basis for maintaining the original result.
Contact Us
Version History
| Version | Date | What's New |
|---|---|---|
| v2.3 | 2026-07-01 |
|
| v2.2 | 2026-04-01 |
|
| v2.1 | 2026-01-01 |
|
| v2.0 | 2025-10-01 |
|
Related Resources
Questions about the evaluation results?
We welcome all forms of supervision and feedback to help maintain the credibility of our review system.